Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co.

91 S.E.2d 195, 93 Ga. App. 214

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 13, 1956

Docket35964

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E.2d 195 (Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co., 91 S.E.2d 195, 93 Ga. App. 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The bill of exceptions in the present case failed to set forth any “assignment of error,” and although the plaintiff in error attempted to amend the bill of exceptions in this court so as to assign error on the judgment of the superior court the writ of error must be dismissed. See in this connection, Winn v. State, 124 Ga. 811 (53 S. E. 318), Rabham v. Rabham, 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193), and Brannen v. Buie, 208 Ga. 193 (65 S. E. 2d 808).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J.

The bill of exceptions in the present case failed to set forth any “assignment of error,” and although the plaintiff in error attempted to amend the bill of exceptions in this court so as to assign error on the judgment of the superior court the writ of error must be dismissed. See in this connection, Winn v. State, 124 Ga. 811 (53 S. E. 318), Rabham v. Rabham, 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193), and Brannen v. Buie, 208 Ga. 193 (65 S. E. 2d 808).

Writ of error dismissed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E.2d 195, 93 Ga. App. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-atlanta-transit-co-gactapp-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack