Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co.
91 S.E.2d 195, 93 Ga. App. 214
Opinion
The bill of exceptions in the present case failed to set forth any “assignment of error,” and although the plaintiff in error attempted to amend the bill of exceptions in this court so as to assign error on the judgment of the superior court the writ of error must be dismissed. See in this connection, Winn v. State, 124 Ga. 811 (53 S. E. 318), Rabham v. Rabham, 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193), and Brannen v. Buie, 208 Ga. 193 (65 S. E. 2d 808).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co., 91 S.E.2d 195, 93 Ga. App. 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).
91 S.E.2d 195 (Smith v. Atlanta Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brannen v. Buie
65 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Rabhan v. Rabhan
195 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)