Smith v. Atlanta Guano Co.

31 So. 490, 132 Ala. 586, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 56
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 4, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 So. 490 (Smith v. Atlanta Guano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Atlanta Guano Co., 31 So. 490, 132 Ala. 586, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 56 (Ala. 1902).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

— Tlie present appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing the appeal which, was taken to that court by the statutory certiorari from the justice court. The ground, of the motion for the dismissal in the circuit court was that the circuit court had dismissed a former appeal in said cause on account of a defect in the security or bond for said appeal, and the former judgment of dismissal was the sole ground for dismissal of the present certiorari proceedings.

In the case of Washington v. Parker, 60 Ala. 447, the certiorari was sued out within the five days, the time prescribed in the statute for talcing an appeal from a justice to the circuit court, and the circuit court on motion dismissed the certiorari because it was sued out [587]*587before the right of appeal had been lost. .This court reversed the action of the circuit court in that case, and in doing so said:. “If the. circuit court was right in repudiating the cause, the result would be that on the rendition of its judgment the appellant could immediately sue out a certiorari and present the case by the same remedy and in the same mode that the court had repudiated.” We think this is a complete answer to* the question as to the judgment of dismissal of the former appeal being a bar'to the second. And on the authority of that case, Washington v. Parker, supra, the judgment of the circuit court will be reversed and the cause remanded. We speak of it as an appeal, because it is nothing more nor less than appeal by indirection. The proceedings are removed by this writ into the circuit court where the trial is had de novo just as on direct appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Kilborn
248 So. 2d 736 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Dearborn Stove Co. v. Dean
115 So. 2d 258 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Ex parte Snedden
65 So. 2d 214 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Ex Parte McDanal
27 So. 2d 504 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)
Ayers v. Barbour
98 So. 34 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 So. 490, 132 Ala. 586, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-atlanta-guano-co-ala-1902.