Smith v. Atkinson

546 F. App'x 299
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2013·No. No. 13-7241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold Lee Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Smith’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Atkinson, No. 9:13-cv-00384-RMG, 2013 WL 3833050 (D.S.C. July 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Atkinson, 546 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2013).

546 F. App'x 299 (Smith v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitaker v. Dunbar
83 F. Supp. 3d 663 (E.D. North Carolina, 2014)