Smith v. Arthur's Fashions, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. Arthur's Fashions, Inc.

873 S.W.2d 245, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1965, 1993 WL 524275

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 1993·No. No. 64058·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), awarding claimant $18,-464.83 in disability and medical expenses. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), awarding claimant $18,-464.83 in disability and medical expenses. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. Arthur's Fashions, Inc., 873 S.W.2d 245, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1965, 1993 WL 524275 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 245 (Smith v. Arthur's Fashions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related