Smith v. Appleton Papers Inc

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 2002
Docket02-1496
StatusUnpublished

This text of Smith v. Appleton Papers Inc (Smith v. Appleton Papers Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Appleton Papers Inc, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1496

BRENDA SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

APPLETON PAPERS, INCORPORATED; MOORE CORPORATION LIMITED, d/b/a Moore Business Forms, Incorporated; THE MEAD CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-01-965-2)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Cowan Ervin Reid, Carlos LeMont Hopkins, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia; Lawrence Joseph Quinn, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland; Laurence Brian Oppenheimer, HISCOCK, BARCLAY, SAPERSTON & DAY, Buffalo, New York; Darlene Paige Bradberry, BREEDEN, SALB, BEASLEY & DUVALL, Norfolk, Virginia; Joseph Dennis Rasnek, CARPENTER, BENNETT & MORRISSEY, Newark, New Jersey, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing her

civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Smith v. Appleton Papers, Inc., No. CA-01-965-

2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Appleton Papers Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-appleton-papers-inc-ca4-2002.