Smith v. Ansara Restaurant Group, Inc

765 N.W.2d 343, 483 Mich. 1023
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Ansara Restaurant Group, Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 484 Mich. 851
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 2009·No. 137164·Published

Opinion

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal May 29, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order limited to addressing whether and how defendant breached its duty of reasonable care, whether that breach was a proximate cause of the injuries to Morgan Smith, and the significance of the presence of Morgan’s parents and their actions in assessing plaintiffs negligence claim. Court of Appeals No. 283826.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Ansara Restaurant Group, Inc, 765 N.W.2d 343, 483 Mich. 1023 (Mich. 2009).

765 N.W.2d 343 (Smith v. Ansara Restaurant Group, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolverine Commerce, LLC v. Pittsfield Charter Township
765 N.W.2d 343 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)