Smith v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Angelone

17 F. App'x 125

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 21, 2001

DocketNo. 01-6461

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 F. App'x 125 (Smith v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Angelone, 17 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ryland Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Ange-lone, No. CA-99-616-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2000 & filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ryland Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Ange-lone, No. CA-99-616-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2000 & filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-angelone-ca4-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack