Smith v. AMARIA
771 N.W.2d 740, 485 Mich. 865
This text of 771 N.W.2d 740 (Smith v. AMARIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. AMARIA, 771 N.W.2d 740, 485 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Curtis SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Yazdi N. AMARIA, M.D., and Dr. Yazdi N. Amaria, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*741 Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
771 N.W.2d 740, 485 Mich. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-amaria-mich-2009.