Smith v. Alworth
This text of 18 Johns. 445 (Smith v. Alworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court. The first cause of demurrer is, that it does not appear that the bond was executed in the presence of any witness. A defendant, who prays oyer of a deed, is entitled to a copy of the attestation and names of the witnesses, as well as every other part of the deed. (1 Tidd Pr. 527. Willes, 288.) And where the defendant is entitled to have oyer, it cannot be dispensed with by the Court; nor can he be compelled to plead without it. (1 Tidd Pr. 528.)
The remaining causes of demurrer appear to be frivo-’ lous. The money in the condition was payable to the plaintiff, by necessary intendment, he having obtained a judgment against James Alwortk, and the condition being to pay the same, with interest and costs.
This Court will presume, that the judgment set out in the condition, is a valid judgment, until the contrary appears, and that the bond was legally taken on an appeal to the Common Pleas. The condition is in the words prescribed by the act to extend the jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace, sess. 41. ch. 94. sec. 17.
The endorsement by the Justice, approving the security,, [447]*447is admitted by the demurrer, and must be considered as made in pursuance of the directions of the act.
The plaintiff is entitled to judgment, and the defendants have leave to plead de novo, in twenty days, on payment of costs.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Vide 1 Dunlap's Pr. 399.340.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Johns. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-alworth-nysupct-1821.