Smith v. Allen

63 So. 770, 9 Ala. App. 371, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Ala. App. 397
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 1913·Published

Opinions

THOMAS, J. —

All the questions raised in this case that are insisted upon in the brief of appellant’s counsel Avere, since this submission, decided in a similar case betAveen the same parties to the record, where the facts Avere not materially different from those here. — Smith v. Allen, 7 Ala. App. 397, 62 South. 296. On that authority the judgment here is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Allen, 63 So. 770, 9 Ala. App. 371, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 317 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

63 So. 770 (Smith v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. Johnson, Parke & Co.
96 Ala. 130 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Evansville, Paducah & Tennessee River Packet Co. v. Slater
101 Ala. 245 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Hulsey
115 Ala. 193 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Smith v. Allen
62 So. 296 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Lewis Land & Lumber Co. v. Interstate L. Co.
50 So. 1036 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Donaldson v. Wilkerson
54 So. 234 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Prine v. American Central Ins.
54 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Mobile & Birmingham R. R. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
54 So. 1002 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)