Smith v. Alexander
This text of 74 P. 240 (Smith v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In order that the errors relied on for reversal in this case may be examined, the record must show that all the evidence had been there preserved. The only statement contained in the record tending to show such to be the fact is the following, occurring at the close of the evidence: “And thereupon the plaintiff, having no further evidence to introduce, rested his case; and the defendant, having no further evidence to introduce, rested his case, [863]*863and the case was closed.” This statement is not equivalent to one that all the evidence is to be found in the case-made. The certificate of the trial judge contains the statement that the case-made contains all the evidence. This, however, is ineffectual. (Sandford v. Weeks, 50 Kan. 336, 31 Pac. 1087.)
The petition in error will be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 P. 240, 67 Kan. 862, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-alexander-kan-1903.