Smith v. Alabama State Bar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Smith v. Alabama State Bar

560 So. 2d 1030, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 6, 1990 WL 4417

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 12, 1990

Docket88-1285

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 560 So. 2d 1030 (Smith v. Alabama State Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Alabama State Bar, 560 So. 2d 1030, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 6, 1990 WL 4417 (Ala. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Virgil M. Smith was charged by the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar with violating Disciplinary Rules 2-105(A) and 5-104(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of the Alabama State Bar. The Disciplinary Board found him guilty of both charges and suspended him from practicing law for 30 days, but provided for automatic reinstatement.

After reviewing the entire record, this Court is of the opinion that the order of the Disciplinary Board is due to be affirmed on the authority of Hunt v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 381 So.2d 52 (Ala.1980). See, also, Courtney v. Alabama State Bar, 492 So.2d 1002 (Ala.1986), and Worley v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 407 So.2d 822 (Ala.1981).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI