Smith v. Alabama Lumber & Cooperage Co.
This text of 176 A.D. 898 (Smith v. Alabama Lumber & Cooperage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the court, erred in ruling as matter of law that the only question was that of damages, and in holding as a matter of law that the unguarded belt was the proximate cause of the injury. The questions of defendant’s liability should have been submitted to the jury. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-alabama-lumber-cooperage-co-nyappdiv-1916.