Smith v. . Agricultural Corp.

172 S.E. 926, 205 N.C. 846, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 89
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 10, 1934·Published

Opinion

Civil action to restrain foreclosure of deed of trust until the accuracy of the description of the lands intended to be conveyed thereby can be ascertained, and the amount of the debt secured thereby can be determined — there being a dispute as to the correctness of both.

From a judgment continuing the temporary restraining order to the final hearing, the defendants appeal. Affirmed on authority of Parker Co. v. Bank, 200 N.C. 441,157 S.E. 419, Wilson v. Trust Co., ibid., 788, 158 S.E. 479, andBroadhurst v. Brooks, 184 N.C. 123, 113 S.E. 576.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. . Agricultural Corp., 172 S.E. 926, 205 N.C. 846, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 89 (N.C. 1934).

172 S.E. 926 (Smith v. . Agricultural Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broadhurst v. . Brooks
113 S.E. 576 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National Bank
157 S.E. 419 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of Maryland
158 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)