Smith v. Adams

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Smith v. Adams

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75 (Smith v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Adams, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court of Errors held unanimously, that part of the decree erroneous, and it was modified accordingly.

Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the only opinion, says: “As my opinion rests on the ground that the bill should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, I think the decree should be so modified, as not to prejudice the complainant’s right to sue at law for the redress of the injury of which he complains.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court of Errors held unanimously, that part of the decree erroneous, and it was modified accordingly.

Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the only opinion, says: “As my opinion rests on the ground that the bill should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, I think the decree should be so modified, as not to prejudice the complainant’s right to sue at law for the redress of the injury of which he complains.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-adams-nycterr-1799.