Smith v. Adams
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75
Opinion
The Court of Errors held unanimously, that part of the decree erroneous, and it was modified accordingly.
Mr. Justice Bronson, who delivered the only opinion, says: “As my opinion rests on the ground that the bill should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, I think the decree should be so modified, as not to prejudice the complainant’s right to sue at law for the redress of the injury of which he complains.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Adams, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 75 (Smith v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.