Smith & Strickland Trading Corp. v. Barclays Bank D. C. O.
13 A.D.2d 932, 218 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10082
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 1961
StatusPublished
This text of 13 A.D.2d 932 (Smith & Strickland Trading Corp. v. Barclays Bank D. C. O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith & Strickland Trading Corp. v. Barclays Bank D. C. O., 13 A.D.2d 932, 218 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10082 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
Opinion
Order entered on December 23, 1960, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to strike the complaint pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and [933]*933disbursements to the' respondent. No opinion. Concur—McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 932, 218 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-strickland-trading-corp-v-barclays-bank-d-c-o-nyappdiv-1961.