Smith, R., Aplt. v. AG

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 18, 2019·No. 61 MAP 2018·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

ROBERT SMITH, : No. 61 MAP 2018 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 420 MD : 2018 dated September 27, 2018 v. : : : ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOSH SHAPIRO, : HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, AND : SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-BENNER, : ROBERT MARSH, : : Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: June 18, 2019

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2019, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is

REVERSED. Bundy v. Wetzel, 184 A.3d 551 (Pa. 2018) (holding that, to satisfy an

inmate’s right to due process, before the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) can begin

deducting funds from an inmate’s prison account for purposes of Act 84, it must inform

the inmate of: (1) his financial liability; (2) the DOC’s policy for deducting funds from

prisoner accounts, and (3) his right to object to the application of the DOC’s policy to his

account); Petition to Stop 20% Deduction for Court Costs, Fines and Restitution from Gifts

from Family and Friends, and the Return of Money Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8127,

6/6/2018, at ¶2 (averring that, upon Appellant’s confinement, the DOC began deducting

funds from Appellant’s prison account “without notification”). The matter is REMANDED

for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, R., Aplt. v. AG, (Pa. 2019).

Smith, R., Aplt. v. AG (Smith, R., Aplt. v. AG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bundy, K., Aplt v. Wetzel
184 A.3d 551 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)