Smith-Pickford v. State

273 So. 3d 1195
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2019
DocketNo. 1D18-2881
StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 3d 1195 (Smith-Pickford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith-Pickford v. State, 273 So. 3d 1195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error with Appellant's judgment or sentence, and affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener's error on Appellant's judgment. See Ashley v. State , 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 n. 3 (Fla. 2003) (defining a scrivener's error as a written clerical error that is not "the result of a judicial determination or error"). Appellant's written judgment reflects that attempted robbery armed with a firearm is a first-degree felony. However, attempted robbery armed with a firearm is a second-degree felony. See §§ 812.13(2)(a); 775.087(2); 777.04, Fla. Stat. (2018). On remand, the trial court shall correct the error.

Wolf, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Ashley v. State
850 So. 2d 1265 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 So. 3d 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-pickford-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.