Smith, Patricia v. Healthcare Service Group

2019 TN WC 68
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedApril 26, 2019
Docket2018-02-0365
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 68 (Smith, Patricia v. Healthcare Service Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith, Patricia v. Healthcare Service Group, 2019 TN WC 68 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Apr 26, 2019 09:00 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY

PATRICIA SMITH, ) Docket No. 2018-02-0365 Employee, ) v. ) HEALTHCARE SERVICE GROUP, ) State File No. 37845-2018 .Employer, ) and ) NEW HAMPSHIRE INS. CO., ) Judge Brian K. Addington Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

This matter came before the Court on April 23, 2019, for an Expedited Hearing. The issues are whether Patricia Smith is likely to succeed at trial in proving she gave timely notice of her injury and whether she submitted sufficient medical proof to show she suffered a compensable injury. For the reasons below, the Court denies benefits at this time. Claim History Ms. Smith worked as a manager for Healthcare Service Group, which provided housekeeping services to a nursing home. Ms. Smith often worked long hours and performed the work of other employees because HSG understaffed the site. On March 30, 2018, she scrubbed the floors on her knees. As she attempted to rise, her foot slipped and her left knee hit the floor. She testified she experienced the same feeling as hitting her "funny bone." Ms. Smith did not report an injury. As time passed, Ms. Smith experienced worsening knee pain and swelling. She eventually wore a brace she purchased herself. She continued working for several months, although she self-limited her work activities. 1 On May 21, Ms. Smith used an especially heavy floor scrubber and noticed her knee swelled more than it ever had. She reported an injury to HSG the following day. 1 Ms. Smith took a week off work in April to attend to her ill husband.

1 Instead of providing a physician panel, HSG directed Ms. Smith to Urgent Care. Ms. Smith told the providers about the March 30 incident, and they took an x-ray, placed her .on light-duty, diagnosed patellar bursitis, and made an orthopedic referral. As a result, HSG directed Ms. Smith to Dr. Thomas Whitman without providing a panel. Dr. Whitman recommended physical therapy that she attended. He then recommended an MRI, but HSG filed a Notice of Controversy and denied her claim on June 21 on the basis that she did not provide timely notice and gave different accounts about how the injury occurred. 2

Following the denial, Ms. Smith sought medical treatment on her own with Dr. James Shipley and underwent an MRI. 3

Ms. Smith argued she is entitled to medical and temporary benefits. She contended HSG was wrong to stop her treatment with Dr. Whitman. If it had continued treatment, she would have undergone the MRI sooner and obtained a better outcome with her injury.

HSG argued Ms. Smith did not provide timely notice and prejudiced the employer's ability to investigate the March 30 incident. Further, she provided no excuse for failing to provide notice because it was obvious she injured herself, as she self-treated and self-limited her work activities. Even if she had provided timely notice, she failed to provide medical evidence that her condition was primarily caused by her work.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Ms. Smith need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, she must present sufficient evidence that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

An employee has an obligation to provide written notice to her employer within fifteen days of the injury, unless the employee has a reasonable excuse. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-201(a)(1). No defect or inaccuracy in providing notice shall bar a claim, unless an employer can prove the failure to provide proper notice prejudiced it, and then only to the extent of the prejudice. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-20l(a)(2). Here, Ms. Smith knew she injured her knee on March 30, but she did not provide notice until May 22. She knew she injured her knee because she felt worsening pain and swelling, self-treated with a brace, and self-limited her work activities. She argued that she tried to work through the pain. This is commendable, but it does not absolve her

2 HSG provided no proof for its reasoning. 3 Other than a notation that Dr. Shipley was treating Ms. Smith, the parties did not introduce his records.

2 obligation to provide timely notice. Also, HSG has shown that it was prejudiced by her actions as Ms. Smith chose to self-treat instead of obtaining medical treatment, and during this time, her condition worsened. The Court holds that Ms. Smith is unlikely to succeed at trial in proving she gave timely notice of her injury.

Even if Ms. Smith could prove she gave timely notice, she has not presented an opinion in where a physician primarily related her knee condition and her need for treatment to her work injury. See Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-6-102(14). Thus, she is unlikely to succeed at trial in proving she suffered a compensable injury. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Smith's claim against HSG and its workers' compensation carrier for medical and temporary benefits is denied at this time.

2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on June 18, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call 855-543-5044 toll-free to participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a determination of the issues without the party's participation.

ENTERED this the 26th day of April, 2019.

IS/ Brian K. Addington BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE Court of Workers' Compensation Claims

Appendix

Exhibits 1. Affidavit of Patricia Smith 2. First Report of Injury 3. Notice of Controversy 4. Off work note-Dr. James Shipley 5. Medical records a. Pro Compounding Pharmacy b. Mountain States Medical Group c. Appalachian Orthopedics d. Lab test chain of custody form e. Med Works Occupational Medicine f. Cora Physical Therapy 6. Witness statements (Identification purposes only)

3 X Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)
§ 50-6-201
Tennessee § 50-6-201(a)(1)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-patricia-v-healthcare-service-group-tennworkcompcl-2019.