Smith-Nunley v. State
Opinion
Willis Smith-Nunley ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following jury trial, of second-degree murder, in violation of section 565.021 RSMo., two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015; and first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020. Movant was sentenced to a total of two consecutive life terms of imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections.1 This Court affirmed those convictions on appeal in State v. Smith-Nunley,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
556 S.W.3d 660 (Smith-Nunley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.