Smith & Nephew Incorporated v. Arthrex, Incorporated

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SMITH & NEPHEW INCORPORATED, JOHN O. HAYHURST, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

ARTHREX, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2014-1729 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in No. 3:04-cv-00029-MO, Judge Mi- chael W. Mosman. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN MICHAEL SKENYON, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also repre- sented by MARK JOSEPH HEBERT, I.

CHARLES W. SABER, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represent- ed by SALVATORE P. TAMBURO, MEGAN S. WOODWORTH, S. GREGORY HERRMAN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court