Smith Motor Co. v. Farmers Implement & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Smith Motor Co. v. Farmers Implement & Supply Co.

275 S.W.2d 790

DecidedFebruary 18, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 275 S.W.2d 790 (Smith Motor Co. v. Farmers Implement & Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith Motor Co. v. Farmers Implement & Supply Co., 275 S.W.2d 790 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080 covering appeals of judgments of less than $2,500. The judgment appealed is for $500. There are three actions involved, but we concur with the opinion of the trial court that the three actions are really one continuous action and should be so treated. The case involved a judgment and attachment of an automobile, its return to the Tennessee seller upon the execution or promise to execute a delivery bond; the attachment of another vehicle of the same seller when no satisfaction was obtained on the judgment; a suit on a su-persedeas bond, and innumerable motions and special pleadings. In a written opinion the learned Trial Judge properly cut this Gordian knot of legalistic complexity and came up with the correct answer.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080 covering appeals of judgments of less than $2,500. The judgment appealed is for $500. There are three actions involved, but we concur with the opinion of the trial court that the three actions are really one continuous action and should be so treated. The case involved a judgment and attachment of an automobile, its return to the Tennessee seller upon the execution or promise to execute a delivery bond; the attachment of another vehicle of the same seller when no satisfaction was obtained on the judgment; a suit on a su-persedeas bond, and innumerable motions and special pleadings. In a written opinion the learned Trial Judge properly cut this Gordian knot of legalistic complexity and came up with the correct answer.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 S.W.2d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-motor-co-v-farmers-implement-supply-co-kyctapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack