Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
168 S.E. 19, 46 Ga. App. 522, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130
Opinion
Under the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the question certified to it in this case (176 Ga. 565, 168 S. E. 18), the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the judge erred in directing a verdict in its favor.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co., 168 S.E. 19, 46 Ga. App. 522, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
168 S.E. 19 (Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
168 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)