Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
168 S.E. 19, 46 Ga. App. 522, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130
This text of 168 S.E. 19 (Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co., 168 S.E. 19, 46 Ga. App. 522, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Under the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the question certified to it in this case (176 Ga. 565, 168 S. E. 18), the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the judge erred in directing a verdict in its favor.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
168 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 19, 46 Ga. App. 522, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-motor-car-co-v-universal-credit-co-gactapp-1933.