Smith (Markell) Vs. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 2020
Docket80766
StatusPublished

This text of Smith (Markell) Vs. State (Smith (Markell) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith (Markell) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARKELL SMITH, No. 80766 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED . Respondent. Ï. APR 0 1 2020 BROWN CLERK

PUlY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to dismiss counsel and appoint alternate counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

4:24ajtelaimatrr. Parraguirre

, J. J. Hardesty Cadish cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Nguyen & Lay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Markell Smith

2 (-11,01111111E1 r. I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith (Markell) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-markell-vs-state-nev-2020.