Smith, K. v. PA DOC
This text of Smith, K. v. PA DOC (Smith, K. v. PA DOC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
KEITH A. SMITH PRO SE, : No. 39 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, : DR. RICHARD MARSH, : SUPERINTENDANT [SIC], : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Writ of Habeas Corpus” and the “Rule to Cause” are
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith, K. v. PA DOC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-k-v-pa-doc-pa-2020.