Smith, Jesse David
Opinion
IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a building and unauthorized use of a vehicle and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment on each count. He did not appeal convictions.
Applicant contends that he was denied pre-sentence jail time, the State breached the plea agreements, and the trial judge had a conflict of interest. Applicant's first claim is dismissed. Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). His second and third claims are without merit and are denied. Accordingly, these applications are dismissed in part and denied in part.
Filed: May 2, 2012
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith, Jesse David (Smith, Jesse David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.