Smith III, Henry Laurie v. State
This text of Smith III, Henry Laurie v. State (Smith III, Henry Laurie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 26, 2005.
In The Qnurt nf AppimIi FiftIi Ohtrirt uf rxas at a1Ia No. 05-05-00224-CR
hENRY LAURIE SMITE!, III, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21670
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whittington, Francis, and Lang
Ajury found Henry Laurie Smith, III guilty ofpossession of metham phetamine in an amount less than one gram, see TEx. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § § 481.102, 481 . 115 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004-05), and assessed punishment at twenty-four months’ confinement in a state jail facility. Appellant, who is representing himself, did not file a brief. Theref ore, we submitted the appeal without briefs. See Lou v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Absent briefs, no points of error are before us. Finding no fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
PER CUR1AM Do Not Publish TEx. R. APP. P.47 050224f.u05 (!tnurt of qirat ifth 1Itrirt of rxas at atta
JUDGMENT HENRY LAURIE SMITH, Hi, Appellant Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court of Kaufman County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-05-00224-CR V. 21670). Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Whittington, Francis, and Lang.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered September 26, 2005.
DOS’ANG5
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith III, Henry Laurie v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-iii-henry-laurie-v-state-texapp-2005.