Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc v. O'Keeffe

Fifth Circuit

Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc v. O'Keeffe

327 F.2d 1003

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 1964

DocketNo. 20605

StatusPublished

This text of 327 F.2d 1003 (Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc v. O'Keeffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc v. O'Keeffe, 327 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The facts which are present in this case are set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc. v. O’Keeffe, D.C.M.D.Fla. 1963, 222 F.Supp. 4. Unless the facts of United States and Gondeck v. Pan American World Airways, 5th Cir. 1962, 299 F.2d 74, are to be distinguished or the principles there set forth are to be rejected, we must reverse the judgment of the district court. The facts are not to be distinguished. Indeed, the facts here make a stronger case for the employer than in Gondeck. We adhere to the doctrine of the Gondeck case and reverse the district court. The cause is remanded for the entry of a judgment for the appellants.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The facts which are present in this case are set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc. v. O’Keeffe, D.C.M.D.Fla. 1963, 222 F.Supp. 4. Unless the facts of United States and Gondeck v. Pan American World Airways, 5th Cir. 1962, 299 F.2d 74, are to be distinguished or the principles there set forth are to be rejected, we must reverse the judgment of the district court. The facts are not to be distinguished. Indeed, the facts here make a stronger case for the employer than in Gondeck. We adhere to the doctrine of the Gondeck case and reverse the district court. The cause is remanded for the entry of a judgment for the appellants.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-hinchman-grylls-associates-inc-v-okeeffe-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack