Smith Haven Mall-Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Assessor of Brookhaven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith Haven Mall-Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Assessor of Brookhaven

105 A.D.2d 790, 481 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 790 (Smith Haven Mall-Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Assessor of Brookhaven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith Haven Mall-Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Assessor of Brookhaven, 105 A.D.2d 790, 481 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review assessments on certain real property, the Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven and the Board of Assessment Review of [791]*791the Town of Brookhaven appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cromarty, J.), dated August 18, 1983, as denied that part of their motion as sought consolidation of the proceedings brought by Macy’s New York, Inc. with the other proceedings.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in arriving at the determination under review. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review assessments on certain real property, the Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven and the Board of Assessment Review of [791]*791the Town of Brookhaven appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cromarty, J.), dated August 18, 1983, as denied that part of their motion as sought consolidation of the proceedings brought by Macy’s New York, Inc. with the other proceedings.

Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in arriving at the determination under review. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 790, 481 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-haven-mall-prudential-insurance-co-of-america-v-assessor-of-nyappdiv-1984.