Smith H. Taylor v. The Monongahela Railway Company
This text of 256 F.2d 751 (Smith H. Taylor v. The Monongahela Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an employee of the defendant under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the jury found in his favor and awarded damages of $45,000.00. Defendant’s ° ! . , , . . , “otlon fo1* a ^ was demed and this aWeal followed-
The issues presented are whether certa“ “edical testimony was properly admitted and whether the District Court properly charged the jury with respect ^ .£u£ure mediCal and hospital expenses.
On review of the record we find no Basic or prejudicial error in the admis-gjon 0f -¿he medical testimony complained of or in the District Court’s instructions to the jury with respect to future medical and hospital expenses,
The Order of the District Court, 155 F.Supp. 601, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 F.2d 751, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-h-taylor-v-the-monongahela-railway-company-ca3-1958.