Smith, G. v. CCP PHL County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 31, 2016·No. 30 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT

GREGORY Si\/||TH, 1 No. 30 E|\/| 20'|6

Petitioner

SHE|LA A. WOODS-SK|PPER,

Respondent

AND .NOW, this 31st day of i\/|ay, 2016, the App|ication for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of |\/|andamus and/or Extraordinary Re|ief is DEN|ED, and the Prothonotary is D|RECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the

oapUon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT

GREGORY Si\/||TH, 1 No. 30 E|\/| 20'|6

Petitioner

SHE|LA A. WOODS-SK|PPER,

Respondent

AND .NOW, this 31st day of i\/|ay, 2016, the App|ication for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process is GRANTED, the Petition for Writ of |\/|andamus and/or Extraordinary Re|ief is DEN|ED, and the Prothonotary is D|RECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the

oapUon.

Smith, G. v. CCP PHL County, (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Smith, G. v. CCP PHL County (Smith, G. v. CCP PHL County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.