Smith ex rel. State v. Omnibus Railroad
36 Cal. 281
Opinions
This ease is not distinguishable from Reed v. The Omnibus Railroad Company, 33 Cal. 212, and Taber v. The Omnibus Railroad Company, decided at the October Term, 1867, [not reported,] and upon the authority of those cases the judgment must be affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith ex rel. State v. Omnibus Railroad, 36 Cal. 281 (Cal. 1868).
36 Cal. 281 (Smith ex rel. State v. Omnibus Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic League
49 Cal. App. 3d 365 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
Elberta Oil Co. v. Superior Court
239 P. 415 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Otis v. City and County of San Francisco
148 P. 933 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Risse v. Collins
87 P. 1006 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)