Smith Ex Rel. State of Fla. v. Croft

Supreme Court of Florida

Smith Ex Rel. State of Fla. v. Croft

109 So. 448, 92 Fla. 273

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 14, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 So. 448 (Smith Ex Rel. State of Fla. v. Croft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith Ex Rel. State of Fla. v. Croft, 109 So. 448, 92 Fla. 273 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff in error sued ont Habeas Corpus to test the validity of an ordinance of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, under which he stood convicted. Upon final hearing the Circuit Judge remanded him to the custody of the Chief of Police, from which order and judgment writ of error was taken. The Charter under which the ordinance in question was passed was Chapter 10552, Special Acts of the Legislature of Florida, 1925.

The order and judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of Angus Gillis ex rel. v. Bert Croft, as Chief of Police this day filed; and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI