Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Nunn

125 S.E.2d 351, 257 N.C. 108, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 557
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 2, 1962·No. 524·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

HiggiNS, J.

The evidence presents an issue, only in minor degree, variant from what has become a familiar motif. Whose fault? Ordinarily, parking on the highway without lights 40 minutes before sunrise is unlawful. G.S. 20-129; Williamson v. Varner, 252 N.C. 446, 114 S.E. 2d 92. Before entering a public highway from a private driveway, the operator of a motor vehicle is required to exercise due care to see that the intended movement can be made in safety. G.S. 20-156.

The plaintiff’s evidence presents a jury question as to the defendant’s negligence in parking upon or entering the highway. Contributory negligence does not appear as a matter of law, though the evidence of speed and following too close to the vehicle in front does likewise present an issue for the jury. Smith v. Rawlins, 253 N.C. 67, 116 S.E. 2d 184.

The judgment of nonsuit is

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Nunn, 125 S.E.2d 351, 257 N.C. 108, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 557 (N.C. 1962).

125 S.E.2d 351 (Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Nunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bigelow v. Johnson
277 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1981)
Davis v. Imes
186 S.E.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Black v. Gurley Milling Co.
127 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)