Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Nunn
This text of 125 S.E.2d 351 (Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Nunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence presents an issue, only in minor degree, variant from what has become a familiar motif. Whose fault? Ordinarily, parking on the highway without lights 40 minutes before sunrise is unlawful. G.S. 20-129; Williamson v. Varner, 252 N.C. 446, 114 S.E. 2d 92. Before entering a public highway from a private driveway, the operator of a motor vehicle is required to exercise due care to see that the intended movement can be made in safety. G.S. 20-156.
The plaintiff’s evidence presents a jury question as to the defendant’s negligence in parking upon or entering the highway. Contributory negligence does not appear as a matter of law, though the evidence of speed and following too close to the vehicle in front does likewise present an issue for the jury. Smith v. Rawlins, 253 N.C. 67, 116 S.E. 2d 184.
The judgment of nonsuit is
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E.2d 351, 257 N.C. 108, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-ex-rel-smith-v-nunn-nc-1962.