Smith ex rel. Smith v. Dillon Supply Co.

214 N.C. 406
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 9, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 214 N.C. 406 (Smith ex rel. Smith v. Dillon Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith ex rel. Smith v. Dillon Supply Co., 214 N.C. 406 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the evidence disclosed in the case on appeal is sufficient to take the case to the jury. The issues of fact were submitted to the jury, and answered adversely to contention of defendant. There is no error in refusal of motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

Exceptions to the charge not set out in statement of case on appeal will not be considered on appeal. Rule 21 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 213 N. C., 808. Paul v. Burton, 180 N. C., 45, 104 S. E., 37; Cherry v. R. R., 186 N. C., 263, 119 S. E., 361.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul v. . Burton
103 S.E. 37 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Cherry v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
119 S.E. 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 N.C. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-ex-rel-smith-v-dillon-supply-co-nc-1938.