Smith ex rel. Situated v. GC Servs. Ltd.
295 F. Supp. 3d 908
District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided November 8, 2017·No. Case No. 1:16–cv–1897–RLY–DML·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff has proffered a non-frivolous theory that Owners Resource Group is a debt collector itself and she need not await an ultimate determination about whether it is before seeking discovery of its net worth.3
Conclusion
The plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 96) to compel the defendants' net worths is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as provided in this order.
So ORDERED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith ex rel. Situated v. GC Servs. Ltd., 295 F. Supp. 3d 908 (S.D. Ind. 2017).
295 F. Supp. 3d 908 (Smith ex rel. Situated v. GC Servs. Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matthias, Robin v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
W.D. Wisconsin, 2020