Smith, Corderral John
This text of Smith, Corderral John (Smith, Corderral John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,815-02
EX PARTE CORDERRAL JOHN SMITH, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR28321-B IN THE 253RD DISTRICT COURT FROM LIBERTY COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without the
possibility of parole. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Smith v. State, No. 13-10-
00552-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Apr. 12, 2012) (not designated for publication).
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because he failed
to conduct a meaningful investigation, pursue any defenses, advise Applicant prior to trial, prepare
Applicant to take the stand, introduce material impeachment evidence, and call certain defense
witnesses to testify at trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. 2
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,
the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 12, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith, Corderral John, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-corderral-john-texcrimapp-2021.