Smith

152 Ct. Cl. 864, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 27, 1961
DocketNo. 62-60
StatusPublished

This text of 152 Ct. Cl. 864 (Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith, 152 Ct. Cl. 864, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180 (cc 1961).

Opinion

Civilian pay; judgment; estoppel by judgment; District Court judgment. — Plaintiff, a civilian employee of the Department of State, sued to recover back pay of which she claims she was wrongfully denied because of the action of the employing agency in bringing about her involuntary retirement for disability. Plaintiff brought an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking restoration, a hearing and back pay, and her suit was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action and for lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed {Smith v. Dulles, 236 F. 2d 739), ruling that plaintiff had failed to show that the action taken by the State Department was improper in any way. Plaintiff’s subsequent suit for back pay on the ground of wrongful dismissal (involuntary retirement) came before this court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the judgment of the District Court, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, in plaintiff’s reinstatement suit, collaterally estopped plaintiff from re-litigating her case in the Court of Claims, citing Edgar v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 9. On January 27,1961, the court, upon consideration of the motion, the briefs and argument of counsel, and on the basis of the Edgar case, supra, ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edgar v. United States
171 F. Supp. 243 (Court of Claims, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 Ct. Cl. 864, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-cc-1961.