Smith Bros. Plumbing Co. v. Engine Air Service, Inc.
This text of 279 A.D. 1082 (Smith Bros. Plumbing Co. v. Engine Air Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The County Court had jurisdiction to try respondent’s claim (Civ. Prac. Act, § 69). The facts established that respondent did not fully perform the employment agreement, in that the commitment procured was not unconditional and was not in accordance with the mortgage loan described in the employment agreement. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See 280 App. Div. 806.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 1082, 112 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-bros-plumbing-co-v-engine-air-service-inc-nyappdiv-1952.