Smith, Billy Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
DocketWR-92,185-01
StatusPublished

This text of Smith, Billy Ray (Smith, Billy Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith, Billy Ray, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,185-01

EX PARTE BILLY RAY SMITH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 349CR-19-34064-A IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ANDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and sentenced to seven years’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant claims, among other things, that he involuntarily pled true to a motion to revoke

his probation. Applicant offers evidence in support, which includes the written agreement on

Applicant’s plea. It has handwritten edits to the type written document changing the award of pre-

sentence confinement credit from 914 to 91 days, with the specific dates indicated. It is not clear

from the document or the habeas record when the edit was made and whether Applicant was aware

of the edit. Applicant claims the time-credit award of 914 days induced him to agree to plead true. 2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Morrow, 952

S.W.2d 530, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Maldonado, 688 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1985). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum

for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim that the agreement

was altered without Applicant’s knowledge. In developing the record, the trial court may use any

means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.

26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of

counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving the disputed

factual issue within ninety days from the date of this order. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate. The district clerk shall then immediately forward

to this Court the trial court’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand,

including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions,

orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions

of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 27, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Maldonado
688 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte Morrow
952 S.W.2d 530 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith, Billy Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-billy-ray-texcrimapp-2021.