Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden

45 S.E. 59, 117 Ga. 822, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 350

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 27, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 59 (Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden, 45 S.E. 59, 117 Ga. 822, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 350 (Ga. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Eisii, J.

An entry made by a proper officer upon an execution issued from a judgment rendered in 'a justice’s court, unless recorded upon the execution docket of the superior court of the county where the defendant resides, will not, even as between the parties to the judgment, arrest the running of the dormancy statute. Civil Code, §§ 3761, 3762; Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Affidavit of illegality. Before W. S. Upshaw, judge pro hac vice. Morgan superior court. September 1, 1902. .

J. R. Rolland, for plaintiffs. George <& Anderson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI