Smita Chakravarthy v. State
This text of Smita Chakravarthy v. State (Smita Chakravarthy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00086-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
SMITA CHAKRAVARTHY, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides Order Per Curiam
This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's second unopposed
extension of time to file the brief. The clerk’s record was filed on June 4, 2014, and
appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). This Court has previously granted appellant one extension of time of 51 days to file the brief, and appellant now seeks an additional 120 days, until December 24, 2014,
to file the brief.
The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART appellant’s second motion
for extension of time to file the brief. This motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will
extend appellant’s deadline to file the brief until November 4, 2014. The Court looks with
disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief in this matter. No
further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. If counsel fails to file
the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act appropriately to ensure that
appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 5th day of September, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smita Chakravarthy v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smita-chakravarthy-v-state-texapp-2014.