SMIRRA v. State

966 So. 2d 1019, 2007 WL 3033405
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2007
Docket5D07-1939
StatusPublished

This text of 966 So. 2d 1019 (SMIRRA v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SMIRRA v. State, 966 So. 2d 1019, 2007 WL 3033405 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

966 So.2d 1019 (2007)

Tonie SMIRRA, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D07-1939.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

October 19, 2007.

Marcia J. Silvers of Marcia J. Silvers, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

LAWSON, J.

Tonie Smirra seeks certiorari review of an order entered by the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, which dismissed her appeal for failure to file an initial brief. Smirra timely sought extensions of the filing deadline for her brief, and "[s]uccessive extensions of time are permissible unless the court has issued an order indicating that no further extensions will be allowed, or the equivalent." United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Total Rehab and Med. Center, 870 So.2d 866, 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (en banc). Here, the court never issued an order indicating that no further extensions would be allowed. Additionally, "considerations of fairness dictate that if a failure to file the brief by the deadline may subject the appeal to dismissal, there must [be] fair warning of that fact in advance". Id. No such warning was given here. Therefore, we find that the circuit court's order dismissing Smirra's appeal departed from the essential requirements of the law, warranting certiorari relief. Id. The State correctly concedes that this relief is warranted.

As the appeal below should not have been dismissed, we quash the dismissal order.

CERTIORARI GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

PALMER, C.J., and EVANDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

UNITED AUTO. INS. v. Total Rehab & Medical Center
870 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
966 So. 2d 1019, 2007 WL 3033405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smirra-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.