Smira v. Roper, Barandes & Fertel, LLP
This text of 302 A.D.2d 305 (Smira v. Roper, Barandes & Fertel, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered April 25, 2002, which, in an action for legal malpractice, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The unappealed order recognizing defendants’ charging lien, entered in the underlying action in which defendants were discharged by plaintiff, bars plaintiffs claim of malpractice as a matter of law (Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242; Siegel v Werner & Zaroff, 270 AD2d 119). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 A.D.2d 305, 754 N.Y.S.2d 872, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smira-v-roper-barandes-fertel-llp-nyappdiv-2003.