Smilo v. Cooper-Smith
This text of 99 N.E.2d 10 (Smilo v. Cooper-Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. We disapprove (see City of New York v. Pike Realty Corp., 247 N. Y. 245) the measure of damages adopted below which was based on estimated parking and storage fees less estimated expense during the term of the lease. Nonetheless an affirmance is in order. There is basis in this record to sustain the judgment furnished by defendant himself as to the value of the lease above the agreed rental. Also the plaintiff’s proof as to value of improvements made to the fee of which the defendant had the advantage is undisputed. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 789, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smilo-v-cooper-smith-ny-1951.