Smilo v. Cooper-Smith

99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 789, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 928
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We disapprove (see City of New York v. Pike Realty Corp., 247 N. Y. 245) the measure of damages adopted below which was based on estimated parking and storage fees less estimated expense during the term of the lease. Nonetheless an affirmance is in order. There is basis in this record to sustain the judgment furnished by defendant himself as to the value of the lease above the agreed rental. Also the plaintiff’s proof as to value of improvements made to the fee of which the defendant had the advantage is undisputed. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smilo v. Cooper-Smith, 99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 789, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 928 (N.Y. 1951).

99 N.E.2d 10 (Smilo v. Cooper-Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubenstein v. Mayor
2018 NY Slip Op 3865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Whitmier & Ferris Co. v. Buffalo Structural Steel Corp.
489 N.E.2d 1288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)