Smillie v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smillie v. County of Nassau

269 A.D.2d 383, 702 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1227

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 383 (Smillie v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smillie v. County of Nassau, 269 A.D.2d 383, 702 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated January 29, 1999, which denied their motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion when it denied the plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar (see, Advanced Ortho-Technology v Orthospec, Inc., [384]*384203 AD2d 218; Knight v City of New York, 193 AD2d 720; Civello v Grossman, 192 AD2d 636; Hewitt v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 178 AD2d 401). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated January 29, 1999, which denied their motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion when it denied the plaintiffs’ motion to restore the action to the trial calendar (see, Advanced Ortho-Technology v Orthospec, Inc., [384]*384203 AD2d 218; Knight v City of New York, 193 AD2d 720; Civello v Grossman, 192 AD2d 636; Hewitt v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 178 AD2d 401). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 383, 702 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smillie-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack