Smiley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smiley v. State

130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 513, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 363

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1925

Docket16724

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 130 S.E. 359 (Smiley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smiley v. State, 130 S.E. 359, 34 Ga. App. 513, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Upon a trial for kidnapping, under an indictment drawn under section 110 of the Penal Code of 1910, the fact that the accused was ignorant of the girl’s age, and that he believed, in good faith, and had good grounds to believe, that she was more than eighteen years of age, is no defense to the indictment. See Gravett v. State, 74 Ga. 191 (1 a); 1 Brill’s Cyclopedia of Criminal Law, § 352, and numerous cases cited.

(a) Under this ruling the refusal of the court to give the requested charge set forth in the motion for a new trial was not error.

2. Conceding (but not deciding) that the admission of the evidence complained of in the motion for a new trial was error, another trial of the case is not required, since, under-the other evidence adduced and the defendant’s statement to the jury, the verdict was demanded.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI