Smiley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smiley v. State

122 So. 3d 493, 2013 WL 5340777, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smiley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 So. 3d 1283 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2013·No. No. 3D13-1823·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the trial judge correctly noted, any credit for the time defendant served between the date of the sentence and his transfer to the Florida Department of Corrections is calculated by the Florida Department of Corrections. For this reason, the trial judge’s decision is affirmed without prejudice to the defendant filing an appropriate administrative or other proceeding in the event that such time was not properly calculated by the Department.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As the trial judge correctly noted, any credit for the time defendant served between the date of the sentence and his transfer to the Florida Department of Corrections is calculated by the Florida Department of Corrections. For this reason, the trial judge’s decision is affirmed without prejudice to the defendant filing an appropriate administrative or other proceeding in the event that such time was not properly calculated by the Department.

Affirmed.

Smiley v. State, 122 So. 3d 493, 2013 WL 5340777, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

122 So. 3d 493 (Smiley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.