Smiley v. Newkirk

1931 OK 4, 294 P. 1091, 147 Okla. 82, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 721
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 6, 1931·No. 21426·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county in an action for writ of mandamus sought by the defendant in error to compel plaintiff in error to pay over moneys alleged to be due.

Judgment was entered directing the issuance of a peremptory writ, and the plaintiff in error appeals.

The plaintiff in error has filed his brief, and the authorities cited reasonably support the contention of plaintiff in error. The defendant in error has filed in this cause a confession of error, and under this condition of the record in this cause the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Warrior v. Savery, 145 Okla. 92, 291 Pac. 966; Holmes v. Board of Commissioners of Osage County, 132 Okla. 297, 270 Pac. 564; Adams v. Powers, 87 Okla. 80, 209 Pac. 395.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smiley v. Newkirk, 1931 OK 4, 294 P. 1091, 147 Okla. 82, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 721 (Okla. 1931).

1931 OK 4 (Smiley v. Newkirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County
1928 OK 558 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Warrior v. Savery
1930 OK 429 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County
270 P. 562 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Adams v. Power
1922 OK 268 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)