Smiley v. Newkirk
This text of 1931 OK 4 (Smiley v. Newkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county in an action for writ of mandamus sought by the defendant in error to compel plaintiff in error to pay over moneys alleged to be due.
Judgment was entered directing the issuance of a peremptory writ, and the plaintiff in error appeals.
The plaintiff in error has filed his brief, and the authorities cited reasonably support the contention of plaintiff in error. The defendant in error has filed in this cause a confession of error, and under this condition of the record in this cause the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Warrior v. Savery, 145 Okla. 92, 291 Pac. 966; Holmes v. Board of Commissioners of Osage County, 132 Okla. 297, 270 Pac. 564; Adams v. Powers, 87 Okla. 80, 209 Pac. 395.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1931 OK 4, 294 P. 1091, 147 Okla. 82, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smiley-v-newkirk-okla-1931.