Smigelski v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

181 L. Ed. 2d 28, 132 S. Ct. 101, 565 U.S. 818, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6837, 80 U.S.L.W. 3182
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1369
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 28 (Smigelski v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smigelski v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 181 L. Ed. 2d 28, 132 S. Ct. 101, 565 U.S. 818, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6837, 80 U.S.L.W. 3182 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

[29]*29Same case below, 124 Conn. App. 81, 4 A.3d 336.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smigelski
4 A.3d 336 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 28, 132 S. Ct. 101, 565 U.S. 818, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6837, 80 U.S.L.W. 3182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smigelski-v-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-scotus-2011.